Everyone has heard of or even seen hair transplant horror stories, maybe in a journal, online or even worse seen the obvious 'plugs' in a elderly friend or relative. However hair transplant surgery has jumped explodes and bound in recent years to make it a viable, safe and not too risky option for those experiencing male pattern hairloss, many celebrities such as Nicholas Cage, Brendan Fraser Mather MOcanhey, Dwayne Johnson ('the Rock', WWE) Salman Khan (Bollywood) and even Italian language Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi are shown to have had hair transplantation surgery, although such is the stigma attached that undertake and don't have said to it freely, it only becomes obvious when studying before and after pictures.

History of Hair Transplant

The beginning of hair transplant surgery originate from Japanese people dermatologist, Doctor. Okuda, who in 1939 published a revolutionary method in a Japanese people medical journal of using small grafts that were similar to the way hair transplantation is completed today. This method involved using hair transplant grafts to correct lost hair from various body areas, including the top of the head, eyebrow, and moustache areas.

In the late fifties one physician in particular, Doctor. Gary Orentreich, begun to research the idea of relocating or transplanting the hair on the back and sides of the visit the thinning hair areas. Doctor. Orentreich's experiments showed anytime bald resistant fur from the back and sides of the head were relocated, they maintained their bald resistant ancestral characteristic wherever these were transplanted.

This principle, known as "Donor Dominance", established that hair could be transplanted from the bald resistant donor areas to the thinning hair areas and continue to grow for a life time. This laid the inspiration for modern hair transplantation. During the sixties and 1970's hair transplants grew in popularity. However, the standard of care involved the use of larger grafts that were removed by round punches and often contained many fur.

In the 80's hair restoration surgery evolved dramatically, as the large punch grafts were gradually replaced with a more refined combination of mini and micrografts. This "combination mini micrografting" hair transplantation procedure no longer used the punch to remove the bald resistant grafts. Rather a deprive of bald resistant hair was surgically taken off the trunk of the head and then cut into mini and micrografts.

Types of Hair Transplant

There are two main methods of Follicular unit hair transplant surgery. Follicular unit Transplant commonly known as FUT or 'strip surgery' and Follicular unit extraction, commonly known as FUE The main difference is the method of taking out the transplanted hair. FUT and FUE are really on the house forms of HT, not competing methods of which one must make a decision.

FUT versus FUE

The 90's saw the gradual introduction of a very refined surgical treatment now known as "follicular unit hair transplantation" or "FUT". This exacting and time intensive procedure transplants fur in their naturally occurring one, two, three, and four hair "follicular unit groupings" in which they grow naturally.

The concept of creating the entire hair restoration using exclusively follicular units was planned by Doctor. Robert Bernstein and was described in the 1995 Bernstein and Rassman publication "Follicular Transplantation". Critical to the success of the follicular unit hair transplant procedure was the introduction of the binocular microscope by Doctor. Bobby Limmer of San Antonio Tx in the late 1980's.

Doctor. Limmer found that with the microscope to examine the donor tissue he and his staff made it possible to successfully separate and trim the naturally occurring follicular units into individual grafts. Doctor. Limmer shared his techniques and findings regarding his fellow workers and together with Drs. Bernstein, Rassman and Seager, was a convincing advocate for the follicular unit hair.

The process involving follicular hair transplants is considered to be the most effective among hair restoration methods. In follicular hair transplant, the surgeon transplants hair from the permanent zone in the back of the top of the head onto the affected areas.

If you need a large area covered, then it is likely you want to go for FUT because it is the cheaper in terms of number of grafts for price paid. If you absolutely, positively don't want deprive surgery as you are focused on scarring, then FUE is your only alternative. Contrary to everyday opinion, both methods leave marks. FUT will leave a narrow line across the back of your head, whereas FUE will leave little unpigmented dots across the back of your head. The only difference is that the FUE marks are not concentrated together and therefore harder to detect when wearing hair very short.

There is no doubt that FUE procedures are harsher on the grafts than FUT procedures. Because of this the final growth assure tend to be lower for FUE compared to FUT. But BOTH procedures work for the most part.

Hair Transplant Cost

FUT operations are performed by reputable cosmetic surgeons around the world however FUE is mostly available through a number of specialists, the vast majority of reputable ones that we know of are in the united states and The us. Pricing for FUE from these reputable cosmetic surgeons is currently close to $7- $11 US dollars per graft for FUE, and depending on what level on the Norwood Scale, a scale used to measure the development of male pattern hairloss, can be quite costly. Pricing for FUT from these same cosmetic surgeons is often in the choice of $4-6 per graft, employing Asia and Eastern Europe prices can be even lower.

Does cheaper means better?

Many of my clients do sometimes look to not spend as much by using other cosmetic surgeons especially in countries such as The indian subcontinent, Pakistan, Thailand and Eastern Europe. Although I believe there have been success stories via this route please remember in these countries there is little guarantee or action available to you if something does go wrong. I have seen hair transplant using the FUT method, although not a horror story in terms of scarring or suffering, it did not yield the expected link between a more established surgeon placing the same number of grafts (2, 000). He is therefore left with poor hair coverage but now has lost the option to 'shave it all off' due to huge smiley faced scar in the back of his head! https://ibrainrobotics.com/HARRTS-V-7.php